Wednesday, May 21, 2025
spot_imgspot_img

Top 5 This Week

spot_imgspot_img

Related Posts

Are Additional Reviews for National Monuments on the Horizon? – Deseret News

Press Release: Controversy Erupts Over National Monuments in Utah amid Rumors of New Development Plans

In a potential shift in conservation policy, the Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante national monuments in Utah may face further reductions as President Donald Trump reportedly considers shrinking six national monuments across the West for mining and oil drilling. According to anonymous sources from the U.S. Department of Interior, this move could revive the contentious issue surrounding these sites, which were significantly downsized in 2017 under Trump’s administration.

The Bears Ears monument was slashed from 1.35 million acres to just over 228,000 acres, while the Grand Staircase-Escalante’s area was reduced from nearly 1.9 million acres to roughly 1 million acres. Following Trump’s defeat in 2020, President Joe Biden restored these monuments to their former size, but they are now facing yet another review.

This interplay of administrative changes has drawn criticism from environmental groups. Kierán Suckling, executive director of the Center for Biological Diversity, condemned Trump’s potential plan to strip protections from these national treasures, asserting it reflects a blatant disregard for America’s natural heritage.

Historically, both monuments have been sites of political contention. The Grand Staircase-Escalante was officially designated by President Bill Clinton in 1996, inciting backlash from local authorities. The current dialogue also highlights concerns regarding energy independence, although previous assessments indicated limited oil and gas resources in these areas.

As Trump seeks to revive fossil fuel exploration, questions arise about the implications for conservation and wildlife in these iconic landscapes. Utah officials expressed no surprise at the renewed discussions, anticipating the continued tug-of-war over public lands. The outcome remains uncertain as legal battles loom on the horizon, poised to shape the future of these protected areas.

Note: The image is for illustrative purposes only and is not the original image associated with the presented article. Due to copyright reasons, we are unable to use the original images. However, you can still enjoy the accurate and up-to-date content and information provided.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Popular Articles