Utah-supported court case raises concerns about federal environmental review process, says Utah News Dispatch

A lawsuit currently before a North Dakota federal district court could potentially shake up nearly half a century of environmental regulations that impact infrastructure projects. The lawsuit, involving a coalition of 21 Republican-led states including Utah, challenges a new regulation put in place by the Council on Environmental Quality that they believe will hinder important infrastructure developments.

The states argue that the new rule overemphasizes climate change and environmental justice, making it difficult to move forward with projects like highways, airports, bridges, and water systems. On the other side, a group of 13 states and advocacy groups have joined the case in support of the Council on Environmental Quality, arguing that the agency’s work is crucial for protecting the environment and public health.

The debate stems from a recent finding by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit that questioned the council’s rulemaking authority. U.S. District Court Judge Daniel Traynor has expressed concerns that the council may not have the authority to pass regulations under the National Environmental Policy Act.

Both the plaintiffs and defense have requested a summary judgment from Traynor, who has yet to issue a ruling on the matter. The outcome of this case could have significant implications for environmental regulations and infrastructure projects across the country.

Source
Photo credit utahnewsdispatch.com